North Carolina Energy Regulatory Process
NERP Overview
From February to December 2020, a group of North Carolina energy stakeholders collaborated through the North Carolina Energy Regulatory Process (NERP) to consider updates to utility regulations and electricity market structures. NERP served as a platform for exploration and advancement of CEP recommendations, specifically fulfilling the “B-1” recommendation to “launch a North Carolina energy process with representatives from key stakeholder groups to design policies that align regulatory incentives and processes with 21st century public policy goals, customer expectations, utility needs, and technology innovation.” Through NERP, additional recommendations of the CEP were considered, including in-depth attention to:
- Adoption of a performance-based regulatory framework (B-2)
- Enabling securitization for retirement of fossil assets (B-3)
- Studying options to increase competition in the electricity system (B-4)
- Implement competitive procurement of resources by investor-owned utilities (C-3)
Purpose
NERP worked to produce recommendations for policy and regulatory changes that can be delivered by the participants to the North Carolina General Assembly, North Carolina Governor, NCUC, and other entities as appropriate. These take the form of issue briefs, policy proposals, and draft proposed legislation developed by participants during the process.
Objectives
NERP applied the following process objectives:
1. Build expertise and trust among North Carolina energy stakeholders through shared principles, foundation setting, education, and identification of priority action areas
2. Examine alternatives to the traditional utility regulatory model and incentives, carbon reduction policies, and as needed, energy market reforms identified by stakeholder group
3. Produce specific policy proposals that participants can work to implement
2020 Final Report and Products
This report is written by RMI and RAP with input from NERP participants to consolidate and record solutions explored in 2020. The work products attached to this report were developed by stakeholders participating in four study groups. The products are intended to aid briefings to decision-makers on the detailed findings for each of the four focus areas of NERP.
Achieving full consensus on reforms was not an objective of NERP, but NERP participants remain dedicated to continuing the conversation and arriving at a reform package that best meets the needs of North Carolina. There was strong support for several reforms discussed in this report, but no one reform enjoys the full support of every NERP participant, and there are nuances to participants’ views. Stakeholders plan to continue to refine details and find areas of alignment in the proposals to advance collectively through the legislative session.
Click Image to Download Full Report
Securitization for Generation Asset Retirement
Contacts
Contact | Organization | |
---|---|---|
NERP Contact | ||
Sushma Masemore | NC DEQ | sushma.masemore@ncdenr.gov |
Performance Based Regulation Study Group | ||
Sally Robertson | NC WARN | sally@ncwarn.org |
Laura Bateman | Duke Energy | laura.bateman@duke-energy.com |
Wholesale Market Study Group | ||
Chris Carmody | NC CEBA | director@ncceba.com |
Securitization for Generation Asset Retirement Study Group | ||
David Rogers | Sierra Club | david.rogers@sierraclub.org |
Tobin Freid | Durham County | tfreid@dconc.gov |
Competitive Procurement Study Group | ||
Steve Levitas | NC CEBA Board | slevitas@pgrenewables.com |
Jack Jirak | Duke Energy | jack.jirak@duke-energy.com |
The NERP Development Process proceeded according to three phases: (1) Foundation Setting, (2) Topical Deep Dives, and (3) Policy Development. Phases included nine participant workshops, supplemented by four webinars.
Participants were divided into study groups based on priority topics of the Clean Energy Plan and stakeholder interest:
- Performance-based regulation (PBR),
- Accelarated retirement of generation assets - including through securitization,
- Wholesale market design and competition, and
- Competitive procurement for resource acquisition.
Each study group consisted of 5-15 participants self-selected to participate in the development of policy recommendations within each topic area. Study groups were responsible for proposal development, presenting to the full stakeholder group on their progress, and for soliciting feedback and incorporating that feedback into proposals.
Each study group produced proposals that were presented in December 2020.
Appalachian Voices |
Carolina Utility Customer Association |
City of Asheville |
City of Charlotte |
DEQ Environmental Justice & Equity Board |
Dominion North Carolina Power |
Duke Energy |
Duke University Nicholas Institute |
Durham County |
ElectriCities of North Carolina |
Environmental Defense Fund |
NC Attorney General's Office |
NC Clean Energy Business Association |
NC Chamber of Commerce |
NC Clean Technology Center |
NC Conservation Network |
NC Electric Cooperatives |
NC Department of Environmental Quality |
NC Governor's Office |
NC Justice Center |
NC Legislature |
NC Manufacturers Association |
NC Retail Merchants Association |
NC WARN |
NC Sustainable Energy Association |
NC Utilities Commission |
NCUC Public Staff |
North Carolina Electric Cooperatives |
Sierra Club |
Smithfield Foods |
Southern Environmental Law Center |